
A few further thoughts before Christmas, pursuing the chain of ideas sketched out in my last post. I’ve been reading Susan Owens’ book, Spirit of Place- Artists, Writers and the British Landscape, a study whose title instantly drew my attention on the shelf in the shop because it appealed to several of my constant interests. Reaching the late nineteenth century, her discussion directed me to a couple of texts which pick up on the very same concepts and mood I’d been trying to evoke lately.
The first book is The Story of My Heart, the 1883 autobiography by the nature writer Richard Jeffries. In chapter three, he described sitting on a burial mound on the Wiltshire downs:
“There were grass-grown tumuli on the hills to which of old I used to walk, sit down at the foot of one of them, and think. Some warrior had been interred there in the antehistoric times. The sun of the summer morning shone on the dome of sward, and the air came softly up from the wheat below, the tips of the grasses swayed as it passed sighing faintly, it ceased, and the bees hummed by to the thyme and heathbells. I became absorbed in the glory of the day, the sunshine, the sweet air, the yellowing corn turning from its sappy green to summer’s noon of gold, the lark’s song like a waterfall in the sky. I felt at that moment that I was like the spirit of the man whose body was interred in the tumulus; I could understand and feel his existence the same as my own. He was as real to me two thousand years after interment as those I had seen in the body. The abstract personality of the dead seemed as existent as thought. As my thought could slip back the twenty centuries in a moment to the forest-days when he hurled the spear, or shot with the bow, hunting the deer, and could return again as swiftly to this moment, so his spirit could endure from then till now, and the time was nothing.”
Jeffries felt able to sense the Neolithic hunter’s presence: “Resting by the tumulus, the spirit of the man who had been interred there was to me really alive, and very close. This was quite natural, as natural and simple as the grass waving in the wind, the bees humming, and the larks’ songs… the immortality of the soul [was] natural, like earth.” The two millennia separating the pair counted for little: “to me, the man interred in the tumulus is living now as I live.” Jeffries continued his meditation: “The supernatural miscalled, the natural in truth, is the real. To me everything is supernatural…. As I move about in the sunshine I feel in the midst of the supernatural: in the midst of immortal things… Everything around is supernatural; everything so full of unexplained meaning… I stand this moment at the mouth of the ancient cave, face to face with nature, face to face with the supernatural, with myself.” For Jeffries, the ancient landscape and its inhabitants seemed still to be alive around him- tangible and close.

A very different response to the same sensations is to be found in Grant Allen’s short story, ‘Pallinghurst Barrow,‘ which was published in the Illustrated London News Christmas number for 1892. It starts one September evening, when Rudolph Reeve is seated on another tumulus:
“The view over the Common, which stands high and exposed, a veritable waste of heath and gorse, is strikingly wide and expansive. Pallinghurst Ring, or the ‘Old Long Barrow,’ a well-known landmark familiar by that name from time immemorial to all the country-side, crowns its actual summit, and commands from its top the surrounding hills far into the shadowy heart of Hampshire. On its terraced slope Rudolph sat and gazed out, with all the artistic pleasure of a poet or a painter (for he was a little of both) in the exquisite flush of the dying reflections from the dying sun upon the dying heather.”
Reeve is about to leave to return to where he is staying “when- of a sudden- a very weird yet definite feeling caused him for one moment to pause and hesitate. Why he felt it he knew not; but even as he sat there on the grassy tumulus… he was aware, through an external sense, but by pure internal consciousness, of something or other living and moving within the barrow… Nothing else was astir [but] in spite of sight and sound, he was still deeply thrilled by this strange consciousness as of something living and moving in the barrow underneath; something living and moving- or was it moving and dead? Something crawling and creeping… mysterious and the marvellous in the dark depths of the barrow.”
Reeve starts to walk away, “yet it seemed to him as if many strange shapes stood by unseen and watched with great eagerness to see whether he would rise and go away, or yield to the temptation of stopping and indulging his curious fancy. Strange! he saw and heard absolutely nobody and nothing; yet he dimly realised that unseen figures were watching him close with bated breath and anxiously observing his every movement, as if intent to know whether he would rise and move on, or remain to investigate.”

Over dinner back at the house, Reeve hears about the superstitions attached to the ancient site, that “Every year on Michael’s night/ Pallinghurst Barrow burneth bright” and that a sacrifice without iron to an ancient god is said once to have taken place. The idea of the barrow opening and light shining out will be familiar from our previous discussion. One of the other guests at the house party is a Professor Spence (whom I would love to imagine was modelled on Lewis Spence, author of British Fairy Origins (1946) and British Fairy Tradition (1948)- except he was only eighteen at the time!) The professor, who is a learned archaeologist, explains to the other diners:
“For you’ve seen MacRitchie’s last work I suppose? No? Well, he’s shown conclusively that long barrows, which are the graves of the small, squat people who preceded the inroad of Aryan invaders, are the real originals of all the fairy hills and subterranean palaces of popular legend. You know the old story of how Childe Roland to the dark tower came, of course? Well, that dark tower was nothing more or less than a long barrow; perhaps Pallinghurst Barrow itself, perhaps some other, and Childe Roland went into it to rescue his sister Burd Ellen, who had been stolen by the fairy king, after the fashion of his kind, for a human sacrifice. And the queerest part of it all is that in order to see the fairies you must go round the barrow widershins- the opposite way from the way of the sun- on this very night of all the year, Michaelmas Eve, which was the accepted old date of the autumnal equinox.”
The MacRitchie mentioned is David MacRitchie, author of The Testimony of Tradition (1890), which sought to rationalise (if not euhemerise) faery tradition by explaining it all as memories of pygmy races that preceded the present populations of Britain. The want of evidence for any pygmy inhabitants didn’t discourage the writer- nor, for that matter, did the complete absence of any folk tradition of faeries kidnapping girls for sacrifice. Of course, for Grant Allen, the professor and his scientific theories are there as a foil to gothic horror of a good old ‘ghost story for Christmas.’
Later that night, Reeves is drawn back to the barrow and is seized and led inside by the shadowy figures he sensed, who wish to sacrifice him to their skeletal King of the Barrow. He only narrowly survives, and the sole person who understands what he has experienced is his host’s daughter, Joyce- “just twelve years old, very light and fairylike”- who has learned gypsy lore and has felt the same ghoulish presence as Reeves.
The idea of former races being more primitive and bestial is very much of its time and may be traced as well in the writings of Arthur Machen and his confounding of ‘Turanians’ and faeries. Nevertheless, the latent antagonism that exists between the ‘Good Folk’ and mortals is a matter I’ve had occasion to examine before– and we can’t deny either that bloodthirstiness and malevolent intentions are traits inherent to some of faerykind- though primarily the ‘faery beasts’ such as kelpies and water horses rather than the human-like creatures- although some, such as the Redcaps or Jenny Greenteeth, do prey upon us if they can.

The sensitivity of the child mind to supernatural forces is also emphasised in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill (1906). Dan and Una accidentally summon Puck by performing the play Midsummer Night’s Dream in Midsummer’s Eve, “in the middle of a Ring, and under- right under- one of my oldest hills in Old England; Pook’s Hill- Puck’s Hill! It’s as plain as the nose on my face” Puck chides them. He’s not really aggrieved though, for:
“By Oak, Ash, and Thorn!’ he cried, still laughing. ‘If this had happened a few hundred years ago you’d have had all the People of the Hills out like bees in June!… You’ve done something that Kings and Knights and Scholars in old days would have given their crowns and spurs and books to find out. If Merlin himself had helped you, you couldn’t have managed better! You’ve broken the Hills- you’ve broken the Hills! It hasn’t happened in a thousand years’.”
What Puck means by ‘broken’ is that, by unwittingly casting a spell and performing a ritual, the children have been able to open the fairy hills: “We didn’t mean to,’ said Una. ‘Of course you didn’t! That’s just why you did it. Unluckily the Hills are empty now, and all the People of the Hills are gone. I’m the only one left. I’m Puck, the oldest Old Thing in England, very much at your service…” I have written previously about the apparent sensitivity of the younger mind to the faery presence- something that may be ascribed to a greater openness, uninhibited by notions of science, rationality and ‘what’s possible,’ or to a special quality, a ‘second sight‘ that is lost as we grow older.
The People of the Hills, Puck explains, were the all the faery folk of Britain- they were the “giants, trolls, kelpies, brownies, goblins, imps; wood, tree, mound, and water spirits; heath-people, hill-watchers, treasure-guards, good people, little people, pishogues, leprechauns, night-riders, pixies, nixies, gnomes, and the rest.” He imagines that they have fled England’s disbelief, but it’s plain from the other two writers cited that they feel so presences to be attached to and inseparable from the land.
What these three disparate texts therefore all capture, in their very different ways, is a sense of connection to the land and, arising from that, the sensation of being thereby connected to ancient residents- the ‘spirits of place,’ we might say, the genius loci of each site or monument. For the British, the spirits naturally seem to be both the ancient dwellers within the tumuli and the faery population living alongside us: they are simultaneously the dead and the immortal.
































